A New Method for Handling Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Group Decision-Making Problems

نویسندگان

  • Shun-Jhong Niou
  • Shyi-Ming Chen
چکیده

In this paper, we present a new method to handle fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making problems. First, we construct fuzzy importance matrices for decision-makers with respect to attributes and construct fuzzy evaluating matrices for decision-makers with respect to attributes of the alternatives. Then, based on the fuzzy importance matrices and the fuzzy evaluating matrices, we can get fuzzy rating matrices for decision-makers with respect to the alternatives. Then, we defuzzify the trapezoidal fuzzy numbers in the fuzzy rating matrices to get the rating matrices for the decision-makers. Then, we construct fuzzy preference matrices for the decision-makers with respect to the alternatives. Then, we calculate the average rating of each decisionmaker with respect to the alternatives. Then, we sort these average ratings in a descending sequence and assign them different scores. Then, we calculate the summation values of the scores of the alternatives with respect to each decision-maker, respectively. The larger the summation values of the scores, the better the choice of the alternative. The proposed method is simpler than the methods presented in [2] and [11]. It provides us with a useful way to handle fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making problems. Keywords— Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Group Decision-Making, Linguistic Variables, Preference Matrix, Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Designing a model of intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR in multi-attribute group decision-making problems

Multiple attributes group decision making (MAGDM) is regarded as the process of determining the best feasible solution by a group of experts or decision makers according to the attributes that represent different effects. In assessing the performance of each alternative with respect to each attribute and the relative importance of the selected attributes, quantitative/qualitative evaluations ar...

متن کامل

A New Balancing and Ranking Method based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets for Solving Decision-making Problems under Uncertainty

The purpose of this paper is to extend a new balancing and ranking method to handle uncertainty for a multiple attribute analysis under a hesitant fuzzy environment. The presented hesitant fuzzy balancing and ranking (HF-BR) method does not require attributes’ weights through the process of multiple attribute decision making (MADM) under hesitant conditions. For the rating of possible alternati...

متن کامل

A new evaluation model for selecting a qualified manager by using fuzzy Topsis ‎approach

Considering the contemporary business settings, managers’ role is more than essential to the viability and further development of an organization. Managers should possess such skills in order to effectively cope with the competition. Multiple attributes decision making (MADM) is an approach employed to solve problems involving selection from among a finite number of alternatives. The aim of thi...

متن کامل

A NEW MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD BASED ON BIPOLAR FUZZY SOFT GRAPHS

In this research study, we present a novel frame work for handling bipolar fuzzy soft information by combining bipolar fuzzy soft sets with graphs. We introduce several basic notions concerning bipolar fuzzy soft graphs and investigate some related properties. We also consider the application of the bipolar fuzzy soft graphs. In particular, three efficient algorithms are developed to solve mult...

متن کامل

Designing a Model of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Vikor in Multi-attribute Group Decision-making Problems

Multiple attributes group decision making (MAGDM) is regarded as the process of determining the best feasible solution by a group of experts or decision makers according to the attributes that represent different effects. In assessing the performance of each alternative with respect to each attribute and the relative importance of the selected attributes, quantitative/qualitative evaluations ar...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009